<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOM Marriage News: October 23, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nomblog.com/544/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nomblog.com/544/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peggy</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9159</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9159</guid>
		<description>Luis,

Your book sounds fantastic.  I&#039;ll check it out!

Thank you for pursuing the truth and sharing it with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis,</p>
<p>Your book sounds fantastic.  I'll check it out!</p>
<p>Thank you for pursuing the truth and sharing it with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9153</guid>
		<description>Kevin - 

The hypocrisy of your quote is laughable! &quot;Getting parishioners to vote on political issues is imposing church doctrine on everyone, faithful or not.&quot;

Get real. A call to action is a tool used by all sides in a debate. I can think of many instances where the GLBT groups used Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, email etc. to mobilize the &quot;troops&quot; in an effort to promote their agenda. Don&#039;t complain when the other side uses their tools to mobilize and coordinate their efforts. 

My personal view is that you have every right to happiness but you don&#039;t have a right to define what I believe is a marriage relationship: one man and one woman. Further I believe that kids do best with a mom and a dad. I don&#039;t see how one of the males in a two male relationship can be a &quot;mother&quot; figure nor how one of the females in a two female relationship can be a &quot;father&quot; figure. 

Are my feelings based on religious dogma? Nope.  
Are my feelings based on some imagined hatred I have for GLBT people? Nope. 
They are based on own personal thoughts and feelings. Nothing more, nothing less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin - </p>
<p>The hypocrisy of your quote is laughable! "Getting parishioners to vote on political issues is imposing church doctrine on everyone, faithful or not."</p>
<p>Get real. A call to action is a tool used by all sides in a debate. I can think of many instances where the GLBT groups used Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, email etc. to mobilize the "troops" in an effort to promote their agenda. Don't complain when the other side uses their tools to mobilize and coordinate their efforts. </p>
<p>My personal view is that you have every right to happiness but you don't have a right to define what I believe is a marriage relationship: one man and one woman. Further I believe that kids do best with a mom and a dad. I don't see how one of the males in a two male relationship can be a "mother" figure nor how one of the females in a two female relationship can be a "father" figure. </p>
<p>Are my feelings based on religious dogma? Nope.<br />
Are my feelings based on some imagined hatred I have for GLBT people? Nope.<br />
They are based on own personal thoughts and feelings. Nothing more, nothing less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9132</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9132</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

Are you suggesting, once again, that people of faith shouldn&#039;t vote their faith?  Why not?  We have a right to vote, do we not?  At that, wouldn&#039;t it be hypocritical for people of faith to not take action?  Or would you just like us Christians to idly stand by and let the cards fall where they may?  Lastly, isn&#039;t voting the best way to &quot;speak out?&quot;  If not, what would you suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>Are you suggesting, once again, that people of faith shouldn't vote their faith?  Why not?  We have a right to vote, do we not?  At that, wouldn't it be hypocritical for people of faith to not take action?  Or would you just like us Christians to idly stand by and let the cards fall where they may?  Lastly, isn't voting the best way to "speak out?"  If not, what would you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9128</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9128</guid>
		<description>Yes, we should all support &quot;queering&quot; of elementary school children through our support of homosexual &quot;marriage&quot; .  Kevin Jennings, the pedophilia supporter and our new public school &quot;safety&quot; czar has expressed this as his ultimate goal.  After all, we all want our sons to spend most of their time at STD clinics and see our daugthers live angry and frustrated lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we should all support "queering" of elementary school children through our support of homosexual "marriage" .  Kevin Jennings, the pedophilia supporter and our new public school "safety" czar has expressed this as his ultimate goal.  After all, we all want our sons to spend most of their time at STD clinics and see our daugthers live angry and frustrated lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9118</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9118</guid>
		<description>Kevin, calling homosexuality marriage doesn&#039;t make it marriage.  Nowhere in her papers does it say that homosexuality is good for kids.  Try reading that one again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, calling homosexuality marriage doesn't make it marriage.  Nowhere in her papers does it say that homosexuality is good for kids.  Try reading that one again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>Denise,

Maggie Gallagher says that having married parents is better for kids than having unmarried parents. She says that the children of married parents do much better in life than the children of unmarried parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise,</p>
<p>Maggie Gallagher says that having married parents is better for kids than having unmarried parents. She says that the children of married parents do much better in life than the children of unmarried parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9114</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9114</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s a new one.  Homosexuality is good for children??

You&#039;ve got to be kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that's a new one.  Homosexuality is good for children??</p>
<p>You've got to be kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9108</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9108</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think redefining marriage to include same-sex couples will do any more harm than redefining marriage from being a lifetime commitment to a temporary one. And letting same-sex couples marry would be really good for their children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think redefining marriage to include same-sex couples will do any more harm than redefining marriage from being a lifetime commitment to a temporary one. And letting same-sex couples marry would be really good for their children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9095</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9095</guid>
		<description>do you base your happiness on what other people do or don&#039;t do?  That&#039;s not a healthy way to be.  Pursue happy lives the way you like, redefining the institution of marriage won&#039;t help you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you base your happiness on what other people do or don't do?  That's not a healthy way to be.  Pursue happy lives the way you like, redefining the institution of marriage won't help you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moscar  Canes</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/544/comment-page-1/#comment-9076</link>
		<dc:creator>Moscar  Canes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=544#comment-9076</guid>
		<description>The moral thing to do, is to let homosexulas pursue happy lifes like the rest of the society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moral thing to do, is to let homosexulas pursue happy lifes like the rest of the society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
