You focus on lesbians who have waged war on men and boys. They clearly have. But let us not forget that more and more homosexual male "elites" are raising children (status symbol), exploiting them to legitimize their deviant lifestyles. They selfishly and cruelly deprive those children of mothers for a simple reason that they prefer sodomy with men to conjugal sexual relations with women.

In any event, I agree with you that there must be some kind of a self-destruct mechanism there, genetic or otherwise.

The militant feminist lesbian war on traditional values, on traditional families, and on men and boys generally suffered a setback, but all people who care about the future of society and future of civilization need to keep on fighting.

Sometimes it almost seems there is some genetic self-destruct mechanism that explains this insane movement to divide and weaken the human family, creating a risk of developing splinter groups of human beings who will never come together and will inevitably destroy each other through never-ending conflict. Sometimes it just seems like bad luck that the successful struggle against racism would be followed by a destructive struggle by those who would misapply the lessons from that struggle in order to promote and celebrate exclusion (e.g. lesbians excluding men from their families and their company) of those different from them. And sometimes it seems there must be some conspiracy of the corporatist elites who understand that gay marriage will further divide, distract, and confuse the masses, making them politically weak and ineffectual and less able to resist the social evolution from corporatism to full-blown fascism.

In any event, it was a great victory for the traditional family and for the whole human family in Maine. It is critical that we give people in most of the US time to see the destructive power of gay marriage where it has been accepted before they decide to take that plunge and fundamentally alter their society forever. Once it becomes legal, I am afraid there will be no going back as the lesbians will quickly alter the social rules so that we can never again get back to where we were.

It would seem that homosexuality is more equal than religion. That is the gay activist's idea of civil rights.

She was senior to him in the work relationship. She had power over him on that basis. She also exerted gay identity politics via the HR department to end his employment. The guy was vulnerable as a new hire anyway. If the HR department wants to hire and fire based on ths sort of stuff, then, the HR department should ask people for their views on SSM before they are employed. That way the litmus test can be upfront and honest.

Instead the manipulations are peddled as making others look bad.

Do you really think that this makes the manager and the HR department look good? Okay, then, you'd do the same thing, right? Provoke discussion of SSM in the workplace and press identity politics into hire and fire decisions. Would you if you could?