<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-engineering the Family?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nomblog.com/745/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nomblog.com/745/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TC Matthews</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-14046</link>
		<dc:creator>TC Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-14046</guid>
		<description>Someone said this on another thread, but it&#039;s applicable here: &quot;Everyone is equal. We all have the same rights. There is no litmus test for sexuality when you get your marriage license. As much as you hate marriage, you can’t force it to change just so it suits you better.&quot;

Amen to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone said this on another thread, but it's applicable here: "Everyone is equal. We all have the same rights. There is no litmus test for sexuality when you get your marriage license. As much as you hate marriage, you can’t force it to change just so it suits you better."</p>
<p>Amen to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC Matthews</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-14044</link>
		<dc:creator>TC Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-14044</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;why don’t you nomers, more like anomolies, in here just say it-you don’t think homos deserve equal rights, &quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Actually David, what we&#039;ve been discussing here has nothing to do with homosexuality, and everything to do with marriage, family and children.  I oppose calling single mothers married also.  Does that mean I am a monophobe? I&#039;m against children marrying adults, am I now a pedophobe? As convenient as it is for you to believe marriage laws are all about hate, that&#039;s just not the case.  It&#039;s not about you.  Try to see the bigger picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>"why don’t you nomers, more like anomolies, in here just say it-you don’t think homos deserve equal rights, "</em></p>
<p>Actually David, what we've been discussing here has nothing to do with homosexuality, and everything to do with marriage, family and children.  I oppose calling single mothers married also.  Does that mean I am a monophobe? I'm against children marrying adults, am I now a pedophobe? As convenient as it is for you to believe marriage laws are all about hate, that's just not the case.  It's not about you.  Try to see the bigger picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-14040</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-14040</guid>
		<description>I learned in history class that once upon a time in america, like within the last  years, women were told they weren&#039;t as good as men, black people were told they weren&#039;t as good as white people.

why don&#039;t you nomers, more like anomolies, in here just say it-you don&#039;t think homos deserve equal rights, because that&#039;s what you&#039;re doing?  jesus christ, at least you could be honest about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned in history class that once upon a time in america, like within the last  years, women were told they weren't as good as men, black people were told they weren't as good as white people.</p>
<p>why don't you nomers, more like anomolies, in here just say it-you don't think homos deserve equal rights, because that's what you're doing?  jesus christ, at least you could be honest about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chairm</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13741</guid>
		<description>Five days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC Matthews</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13706</link>
		<dc:creator>TC Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13706</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s funny when stupidity comes with pretention.&quot;

David, the irony here is making my sides ache. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It’s funny when stupidity comes with pretention."</p>
<p>David, the irony here is making my sides ache. <img src='http://nomblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13654</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13654</guid>
		<description>chairm, 

Having still refused to present your educational credentials you have proved yourself to be a truely vituperate individual.  It&#039;s funny when stupidity comes with pretention.

Here it simply put: those against gay marriage are bigots.  Against equal rights=discriminitory bigot. I&#039;m not name calling charim, that is in fact what one who opposes equal rights is. A bigot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chairm, </p>
<p>Having still refused to present your educational credentials you have proved yourself to be a truely vituperate individual.  It's funny when stupidity comes with pretention.</p>
<p>Here it simply put: those against gay marriage are bigots.  Against equal rights=discriminitory bigot. I'm not name calling charim, that is in fact what one who opposes equal rights is. A bigot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC Matthews</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13675</link>
		<dc:creator>TC Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13675</guid>
		<description>excellent article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13674</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13674</guid>
		<description>All of the &quot;no difference&quot; between genderless parenting and man-woman parenting studies have failed to meet standards for scientific validity.   So, the APA is basing it&#039;s assertions on bad science.

http://protectmarriage.com/files/HarvardMarriage.pdf
 
see p. 41-42

The article as a whole is a good comparison between the institution of marriage and what is being proposed as a radical redefinition of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the "no difference" between genderless parenting and man-woman parenting studies have failed to meet standards for scientific validity.   So, the APA is basing it's assertions on bad science.</p>
<p><a href="http://protectmarriage.com/files/HarvardMarriage.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://protectmarriage.com/files/HarvardMarriage.pdf</a></p>
<p>see p. 41-42</p>
<p>The article as a whole is a good comparison between the institution of marriage and what is being proposed as a radical redefinition of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chairm</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13671</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13671</guid>
		<description>Four days later and counting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four days later and counting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chairm</title>
		<link>http://nomblog.com/745/comment-page-1/#comment-13557</link>
		<dc:creator>Chairm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nomblog.com/?p=745#comment-13557</guid>
		<description>Please accurately restate the actual disagreement on the marriage issue.

Demonstrate that you are not operating on a simple-minded basis. Display your enlightened understanding of the marriage issue. Show that you can focus on marriage instead of other stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please accurately restate the actual disagreement on the marriage issue.</p>
<p>Demonstrate that you are not operating on a simple-minded basis. Display your enlightened understanding of the marriage issue. Show that you can focus on marriage instead of other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
