New Mexico voters would decide whether same-sex couples could get married in the state if the Legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment sponsored by state Rep. Brian Egolf, D-Santa Fe.
... The proposal probably won’t have an easy time in the Legislature. Lawmakers in recent years haven’t even been able to pass legislation calling for state-recognized domestic partnership agreements.
... The measure, whose co-sponsors include Rep. Stephen Easley, D-Santa Fe, will first be heard in the House Consumer and Public Affairs Committee.
Monthly Archives: January 2013
Amendment to Approve SSM Introduced in New Mexico
Civil Unions Bill to Be Heard in Colorado Today
This report was filed last week:
State legislators will once again debate a bill that would allow for civil unions in Colorado.
State Sen. Pat Steadman (D - Denver) confirmed to 9NEWS political reporter Brandon Rittiman Thursday that he is introducing the Colorado Civil Unions Act. The bill will get its first hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee next Wednesday.
Senate Bill 11 would "authorize any 2 unmarried adults, regardless of gender, to enter into a civil union."
Last year, the Colorado House failed to vote on a civil union bill before the end of a special session of the legislature. (9News.com)
The Most Critical Court Case Of Our Generation!
Dear Marriage Supporter,
In a tremendous victory for NOM and our allies in the movement to preserve marriage, last December the United States Supreme Court granted the request of the proponents of California's Proposition 8 and agreed to review the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals striking down California's marriage amendment. NOM was the biggest contributor to getting Proposition 8 on the ballot, and has directly contributed over $400,000 to its legal defense. The Court's justices will hear oral arguments in the case on March 26.
Today, the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade — the Supreme Court decision that changed our nation so profoundly — reminds us of how truly important it is to stay engaged in and informed about this current, critical case, which has the potential to impact the future of our nation just as profoundly as that fateful 1973 decision — for better, or for worse!
Therefore, to help you follow this case with the most up-to-date news and commentary, NOM is re-launching a completely revamped and improved www.Prop8Case.com!
This site chronicles the history of the Prop 8 case; features blog posts and twitter feeds with the most up-to-date news about the legal proceedings; and gives you the opportunity to subscribe for updates and stay informed.
Supporter, this case represents an incredible opportunity to win an enormous, historic victory for marriage. From the start of litigation over 4 years ago, NOM has been working tirelessly with the incredible legal team representing ProtectMarriage.com to defend Prop 8 and to assure that marriage and the rights of voters in California and throughout our nation receive the best defense possible.
All of our efforts come down to March 26th, when the justices hear oral arguments, and then the period until the end of June when the justices are writing their decision.
We won't let up until we win.
Please take a moment to check out the new website and stay informed about what may be the Roe v. Wade of marriage. And please stand with us throughout this case with your prayers and support, so that the legacy of the 2013 Supreme Court does not follow the same path as its predecessor from 1973.
Lastly, please help us spread the word. The more eyes on the court, the better!
"Shocking Impact on Schools if SSM Allowed", UK Experts Warn
The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children:
There will be a shocking impact on schools if same-sex marriage is passed into law, experts warned at Westminster press conference today.
Experts on family policy, sex education and ethics agreed that schools will become a focus for the promotion of radical and explicit homosexual material to schoolchildren. In addition, same-sex marriage will be used as a reason to silence objections by teachers and parents to explicit sex education.
The press conference was organised by the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) www.spuc.org.uk , a leading pro-life and pro-family organisation, to launch its campaign warning headteachers about the consequences to schools of same-sex marriage (see further below for the full text of SPUC's letter to headteachers of all state-maintained secondary schools).
SPUC opposes the redefinition of marriage in law to include same-sex couples, because it would undermine the true nature of marriage and thus the pro-life benefits of marriage. Marriage offers the most protective environment for both unborn and born children. SPUC also campaigns against explicit sex education because such teaching fails to reduce abortions.
Bobby Lopez on Lessons from France on Defending Marriage
Bobby Lopez, a self-identified bisexual raised by lesbians, describes the unique voices presenting the case for marriage in France:
"...The best parallel one could offer [to gay voices against gay marriage in France] is that many Jewish commentators are particularly harsh in their critiques of Israel not in spite of, but rather because of, the Jewish state’s claim of acting in their name. The same dynamic may explain the plethora of gay men who have not only supported but orchestrated the march on Paris to protest gay adoption. The idea of instrumentalizing children’s lives as a way of fulfilling gay aspirations is so abhorrent to a foundational Gallic sense of decency that the gay men who are being invoked to license it seem first in line to denounce it.
It is time for Americans to follow France’s lead. Frigide Barjot, Laurence Tcheng, and Xavier Bongibault have presented us with a game changer. They have given us the necessary rhetoric and republican logic to present a strong case against redefining marriage. They have provided us a playbook for mobilizing across party lines. They’ve presented colorful characters whom we can emulate. I will keep translating the news as it comes in, in the hope that American defenders of the family will be inspired to do as the “march for all” movement has done." (Public Discourse)
Video: What is Marriage? Authors Present Their Case in Half an Hour
Here is the link for the video of the presentation made at Heritage by the authors of What is Marriage? A Defense: One Man, One Woman -- Prof. Robby George, Ryan Anderson and Sherif Girgis:
http://www.heritage.org/events/2013/01/what-is-marriage
They make the case for marriage in about 30 minutes and then offer 25 minutes of Q&A.
This is must-watch for those want to become better at articulating the positive case for marriage!
"A Student Who Voices Reservations About SSM Could be Accused of Bullying LGBT Students"
Katherine Kersten in the Star-Tribune on the agenda behind Minnesota's anti-bullying initiative:
"...Why this new law? The task force appears to presuppose that bullying is a pervasive and growing problem. In fact, however, incidents of bullying and intimidation have dropped markedly in recent years, according to surveys by the Department of Justice.
And while the task force gives the impression that LGBT students are a primary focus of bullying, evidence suggests that the vast majority of bullying is directed at other students. The DOJ surveys indicate that the percentage of 12- to 18-year-old students who reported being targets of hate-related words based on their sexual orientation fell from 1.0 percent in 2007 to 0.6 percent in 2009.
... Not surprisingly, the task force's proposed new antibullying regime would not treat all children equally, despite lip service to this goal. Instead, it focuses on students in "protected classes," including sexual orientation and "gender identity or expression."
Under the task force's vague and overbroad definitions of bullying and harassment, students could be punished for "direct or indirect interactions" that other students --especially those in protected groups -- claim to find "humiliating" or "offensive," that have a "detrimental effect" on their "social or emotional health," or even that promote a "perceived imbalance of power."
By this standard, a student who voices reservations about same-sex marriage could be accused of bullying LGBT students." (Star-Tribune)
"If Some People Can Oppose SSM for Reasons Other Than Hate, Bigotry and Small-Mindedness, Why Can’t Others?"
Glenn Stanton at First Things asks a provocative question:
"...As David Mills notes below, Wendell Berry has recently claimed that opponents of same-sex marriage are necessarily and categorically rejecting a whole class of people. He tells us this kind of “categorical condemnation is the hatred of the mob” and as such is the worst kind of hate.
... Reuters reported that “even homosexuals opposed to gay marriage [came] to protest” [at the Paris rally.]
John D’Emilio, noted professor of history and pioneer in the field of gay and lesbian studies has, as a gay man and leading LGBT theorist, been vocally opposed (shown here and more recently here) to the idea of working for the legalization of same-sex marriage. He contends it is contrary to queer ideals and unjust to gays in other types of relationships. D’Emilio and our French friends are not odd outliers. Here is another and another and another and a few more and one more leading gay voices that assert the passage of same-sex marriage can actually be discriminatory and limiting. Uhm.
If some people can oppose same-sex marriage for reasons other than hate, bigotry and small-mindedness, why can’t others?
National Organization for Marriage Criticizes President's Decision to Divide Nation Over Marriage on Inauguration Day
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 21, 2013
Contact: Elizabeth Ray or Jen Campbell (703-683-5004)
National Organization for Marriage Criticizes President's Decision to Divide Nation Over Marriage on Inauguration Day
“Gay and lesbian people already enjoy full equal rights under the law."
– Brian Brown, NOM president –
Washington, D.C. — Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), criticized President Obama’s decision to use his Inauguration Day address to further divide the nation on the question of what is marriage. The President chose to make a veiled reference to redefine marriage when he said "our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law."
"Gay and lesbian people are already treated equally under the law," Brian Brown responded. "They have the same civil rights as anyone else; they have the right to live as they wish and love whom they choose. What they don’t have is the right to redefine marriage for all of society. In fact, six federal courts have rejected the idea that there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court in a summary decision in 1972. Furthermore, the vast majority of states have codified the commonsense view held for thousands of years that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. The President is profoundly wrong to imply that those who have acted to protect marriage have denied anyone's rights by doing so."
Brown continued: "A presidential inauguration should be a time for the nation to come together; instead President Obama chose to voice his support for a radical agenda advanced by some of his biggest campaign contributors to redefine marriage for everyone. Marriage brings our nation together. The concept of gay ‘marriage’ would have been totally alien to our founding fathers, and the protection and advancement of marriage between one man and one woman will immeasurably serve the common good of this country and further strengthen our Union. Today the President should have thrown his support behind this beautiful vision of men and women coming together in love to raise the next generation. Nonetheless, we pro-marriage Americans pledge to defend the institution which the President has chosen to undermine once again."
###
To schedule an interview with Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for Marriage, please contact Elizabeth Ray (x130), [email protected], or Jen Campbell (x145), [email protected], at 703-683-5004.
Paid for by The National Organization for Marriage, Brian Brown, president. 2029 K Street NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20006, not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. New § 68A.405(1)(f) & (h).
We Can Reclaim America and Restore Our Future
Dear Marriage Supporter,
Today is a historic day by any measure.
NOM joins the nation in extending our best wishes and prayers to President Barack Obama as he takes the oath of office for a second term as President of these United States of America. We hope and pray that President Obama is able in his second term to bring America together, to heal the divisions that exist in our nation, and to put our country on a firmer path to recovery and well-being for American families. We pray as well for the president's family and thank them for accepting the sacrifices that public service imposes on men and women who pursue it.
Today is also the day that we celebrate the birth of one of our great national leaders, Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. King is rightly known as one of the greatest civil rights leaders in our nation's history, a cause he paid for with his life.
It is fitting that President Obama today takes the oath of office on two bibles — one belonging to Abraham Lincoln, and the other to Dr. King.
But as I reflect on the America we live in today and the society we are building for my eight children, I can't help but be concerned. Too many of our people live in poverty. They are impoverished not only by unemployment and the throes of a struggling economy, but by cultural forces that rob people of their inherent, God-given dignity, and entice them through false prophets and by false promises, often peddled in the guise of providing pleasure but that ultimately bring nothing but sadness and even despair.
Last November during the same election that sent President Obama to a second term, three states allowed marriage to be redefined with the president's misguided encouragement. If this is the path we're on, and it's not a good one. The President bears considerable responsibility for this as a result of his abandonment of the eternal truth of the uniqueness of the marriage relationship.
Yet as I watch the pageantry of a presidential inauguration I am reminded of the vast power and potential of our country to be a tremendous force for good.
How do we help America get on a better path, one that uplifts families, that inspires future generations to greatness?
Very simply, I think we need to call our nation to good — to pursue law and policies that promote social good and are based on moral truths.
I think one key is in the words of Dr. King, set forth so articulately in the spring of 1963 while sitting in jail in Birmingham, Alabama. King's Letter From Birmingham Jail called the nation to understand that there are just laws, and unjust ones. Dr. King said, "A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law."
Dr. King went on note that segregation laws were plainly unjust: "All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority."
Marriage is the very type of relationship that Dr. King would no doubt have recognized as just, rooted as it is in the moral law, observed over thousands of years as an eternal law, in perfect harmony with the law of God. It is a profoundly just institution that brings men and women together and provides children with the best opportunity to be raised by a mother and a father.
So many of our laws and policies today are out of harmony with natural law and nature's God. The killing of the preborn innocent in the name of privacy; the euthanizing of the infirm in the name of compassion; the destruction of embryonic humans in the name of advancement; the protection of pornography purveyors and the merchants of violence in Hollywood and the video game industry in the name of free speech; and the restructuring of instutions like marriage to provide emotional satisfaction to politically powerful adults, even as they strip from the law the right of children to a mother and father.
No, indeed, we as a nation are not on a good path.
But it is not too late to change direction and to choose a better path. If we are willing to keep Dr. King's admonition in mind to pursue policies that are just, that are in harmony with eternal, natural and moral law, then we can reclaim America and restore our future.
NOM is committed to working with all policymakers, legislators, judges and officials — President Obama included — to support policies that strengthen marriage and thereby uplift American families, protect children and advance the common good. That is our commitment to the nation, and that is our promise to you.
On this historic day, may God continue to richly bless this country, her elected and appointed officials, and the men and women who serve under her flag.
Video: European Court of Human Rights Cases Discussed on BBC News
The BBC reviews the decisions made in the cases of four Christians, three of whom lost their bids to defend their conscience rights:
Andrea Williams of the Christian Legal Centre says at one point: "... in the case of Lillian Ladele, [there was never] any refusal of a service to any homosexual couple. So I think here we have to really get a sense of perspective on what is happening, what have the English courts said? They've said this: your freedom to manifest your faith is your freedom to resign. Well of course that's no freedom at all."
Weigel on Why the State Has No Right to Redefine Marriage
Public intellectual George Weigel continues his series for First Things describing what the marriage debate is about:
"...Throughout history, just states (whether democratic or not) have understood that there are limits to their powers: There are certain things that just states simply cannot do.
With rare exceptions, the just state cannot interfere in the doctor-patient relationship or the lawyer-client relationship; it can never interfere in the priest-penitent relationship; it ought to be extremely chary of interfering in the parent-child relationship (save in obvious cases like abuse); and there are limits (always subject to debate and adjustment) about the state’s reach into the employer-employee relationship. The just state acknowledges the integrity of these primary, fundamental, civil society relationships and protects them legally. It has no business reinventing or redefining those relationships, for the just state exists to serve civil society, not vice versa.
Marriage is the primordial civil society relationship, for it is the basis of the family, which is the primordial civil society institution. That is why, for millennia, states have protected marriage, understood as what it is: the stable union of a man and a woman ordered to the begetting and raising of children. When a state claims the right to alter the definition of marriage to include same-sex relationships, it is tacitly claiming the right to redefine the number of persons who may make a marriage (why stop at two?); it is also tacitly claiming the right to redefine, by governmental fiat, every other pre-existing free association of civil society.
That claim is antithetical to the freedom of individuals, families, and society." (First Things)
Support for SSM in France Falls From 65% to 50% in Wake of Paris Rally
President Francois Hollande is planning to legalize same-sex marriage, but the country's Catholic bishops and other religious leaders are fighting the initiative.
Public opinion appears to be moving in their favor, with a recent poll showing about 50 percent of French support same-sex marriage, down from 65 percent in August.
France has already legalized civil unions for same-sex couples, but this new law gives gay couples the rights to adopt.
Traditional French groups say children should be raised by a mother and a father.
Photo: Paris Pro-Marriage Rally Featured on Front Page of Sao Paulo, Brazil Newspaper
Italy's Prime Minister Says No to Gay Marriage
Italy’s Prime Minister Mario Monti, who is running for re-election in February, has rejected same-sex marriage.
Interviewed by SkyTg 24, Monti explained: ‘I think that a family is only made of a man and a woman. Children should grow with a father and a mother.’
But he indicated he was in favor of giving same-sex partners some of the rights and responsibilities of married heterosexuals.
‘A parliament could find good solutions for civil partnerships or civil unions. But we can not call them “families”,’ he said.