NOM BLOG

Monthly Archives: March 2011

Gay Marriage as an Economic Development Plan?

The headline in the March 16, 2011 Columbus, Indiana Republic said “Cummins: Gay Marriage Ban Bad for Business.”

Cummins, Inc. which makes engines and emissions control systems and mobile energy units for the Army, and stuff like that, is headquartered in Columbus, Indiana. During state senate hearings over the Indiana state marriage amendment Jill Cook, the vice president of human resources, testified that the marriage amendment would harm Cummins’ business and make the company reluctant to create jobs in Indiana.

“This resolution sends a powerful message that Indiana is not a place that welcomes people of all backgrounds, and it jeopardizes our ability to be competitive in global markets,” Ms. Cook testified.

I hope not under oath, or with her hand on a Bible, because that’s an amazing whopper we are hearing more and more often.

In Rhode Island, newly-elected Gov. Lincoln Chafee actually touted gay marriage as a serious and important part of his economic development plan for Rhode Island.

In his inaugural address he claimed passing gay marriage would do “more for economic growth in our state than any economic-development loan.” He’s taken to running around Providence brandishing a copy of the 2007 book “The Flight of the Creative Class” by Prof. Richard Florida, to try to prove his point.

“In January,” notes Providence Journal columnist Edward Fitzpatrick, “Chafee talked about Florida’s book when he chaired the state Economic Development Corporation Board for the first time. And during the February 6 edition of WJAR’s ‘10 News Conference,’ Chafee cited the book in making the case for legalizing same-sex marriage . . .”

On “10 News Conference,” Jim Taricani noted that in his inaugural speech, Chafee said, “Mark my words, those two actions will do more for economic growth in our state than any economic development loan.”

Taricani asked, “Do you have a factual basis for saying that? Has that been the case in other states?”

“Sure,” Chafee said. “Look at Silicon Valley. Look at Cambridge.” Taricani asked, “What did that have to do with gay marriage or illegal immigration?”

(Particularly since they don’t have gay marriage in Silicon Valley).

But undaunted Chafee persisted in digging his hole: “These are areas where innovation prospers. And there is a book out by Richard Florida people are talking about, and he’s making that exact point.”

Taricani asked, “What?”

“That you can look at economic growth where there is tolerance,” Chafee said.

Clearly a new meme has been launched. The people who launched it must be counting on the idea that nobody will bother to point out how ludicrously unsupported by the facts it is.

Whether or not “tolerance” is associated with economic growth, gay marriage is clearly not.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes yearly and trend data on economic growth, including the year’s increase in personal income per capita.

Take a look at this chart: eight of the top ten states with the fasted growth in per capital personal income from 1999-2009 have state marriage amendments. None have gay marriage.

1999-2009 average annual growth rate of PCPI (Per capita personal income)

State                PCPI increase     Marriage amendment?

Wyoming        5.9%
North Dakota 5.7%                    Yes
Louisiana        5.3%                    Yes
Montana         4.7%                    Yes
Oklahoma       4.6%                   Yes
South Dakota 4.4%                   Yes
Hawaii             4.4%                   Yes
West Virginia  4.3%
Arkansas          4.2%                  Yes
Alaska              4.2%                   Yes

Or consider another potential measure of a state’s business climate: What do CEO’s think? Chief Executive magazine annually surveys 543 CEOs to identify which states are the best and the worst for job growth and business. In 2009, the top five states were: Texas, North Carolina, Florida, Georgia and Tennessee. Four out of five have marriage amendments, and none have gay marriage.

(The worst? California, New York, Michigan, New Jersey, and yes, Massachusetts.)

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also compiles a list of states that are the top "overall growth performers" a measure which combines job growth rate since 2000, and since 2007, gross state product (GSP), real GSP growth since 2000, GSO per job 2008, and growth in GSP per job. The top five states in overall growth performance (in descending order): North Dakota, Virginia, South Dakota, Maryland and Wyoming.  The top three all have state marriage amendments, none have gay marriage (Indeed the Maryland legislature in a surprise move rejected a gay marriage bill this month after a powerful public outpouring of objections, including from black churches).

Perhaps my favorite data point comes from this same recent U.S. Chamber of Commerce survey (“Enterprising States”) which includes a ranking for what it called “middle-class job growth.” These are presumably the good jobs that the creative class seeks or fosters or whatever.

What are the top five states for growing middle-class jobs between 2002 and 2009? Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, Hawaii and Texas.

True of these five states one—Wyoming—does not have a marriage amendment—yet. It almost passed one, this year however. If it did, perhaps its middle class job growth will come plunging to a halt, but somehow I doubt it.

The tiny number of liberal northeastern states that have embraced gay marriage tend to have high per capita incomes, because they are much older, supporting fewer children, and much whiter, and better educated than average. They are older in part because with so little job growth, young adults with families move elsewhere, most likely to a southern state with a marriage amendment that enjoys more robust economic growth.

Why would a representative from Cummins, Inc. make such a ludicrous claim that we would say misleads the public, if it were not for the fact the public finds it ludicrous too? We do not know, we say, shaking our heads in amazement.

But a few days ago Cummins’s CEO Tim Solso was appointed to Pres. Obama's Presidential Management Advisory Board.

A bit of behind the scenes back-scratching?

We’ll never know for sure.

One thing we do know for sure: if gay marriage is a big part of your governor’s or your business leaders’ idea of an economic development plan, your state is in trouble.

[For a printable version of this article, click here.]

Maryland: In the End, The Churches Won

Blair Lee, CEO of the Lee Development Group in Silver Spring, MD writes in the Maryland Gazette on March 18th about "Gay Marriage on the Rocks."

He points out the gay lobby, supposedly speaking for the oppressed, is actually so powerful that not a single lobbyist could be hired to defend marriage. But the churches won anyway:

"This was supposed to be gay marriage's moment in Maryland. All the legislative roadblocks were cleared, and a governor who opposes gay marriage said he'd gladly sign the bill (go figure)...

Meanwhile, the well-organized, deep-pocketed gay lobby was applying a full court press.

They hired a top State House lobbying firm, flooded senators with e-mails, filled the Senate galleries and demonstrated outside the State House. A wildly sympathetic press corps put a human face on the bill with heart-rending stories of upstanding gay couples, while The Post and The Sun endlessly editorialized about the bill's merits and "inevitability."

Academics, clergy, the ACLU and gay couples testified passionately for the bill, while the legislature's eight openly gay members (the most in the nation) worked from within. Every statewide elected official supported the bill, as did every member of the Montgomery delegation backed by the County Council. (If Montgomery's lawmakers fought as hard for state aid as they do for gay marriage, the county wouldn't have a $300 million deficit.)

Meanwhile, the bill's opponents, caught off-guard, mounted a weak, disorganized defense. In fact, so powerful and intimidating is the gay lobby that no State House lobbying firm dared represent the coalition of churches opposing the bill.

...Six days a week Americans hear the "gay is good" message broadcast from every media outlet. One day a week, in church, they hear the other side.

Yet, despite these odds, organized religion has trumped the gay lobby in every showdown where the people were allowed to decide.

In the five gay marriage states it was the courts, not the voters, who ruled, and in the last election all the Iowa judges who legalized gay marriage were turned out by the voters.

The Onion's Apocalyptic Take on SSM in Iowa

We shared a chuckle when we saw this satirical story in "American's Finest News Source" (aka The Onion):

Town Of Davenport, Iowa Descends Into Hell Following Gay Marriage Ceremony
Immediately following the performance of a same-sex marriage ceremony Sunday afternoon at Holy Christ Almighty Lutheran Church on Lincoln Avenue, the city of Davenport, IA and all 99,685 of its residents were reportedly smitten into oblivion by the merciless wrath of God and flung into the deepest bowels of eternal hell.

According to state authorities, the nightmarish incident occurred approximately five seconds after a local pastor pronounced homosexual men Brian Palmer, 39, and Greg DeHaan, 43, married in the eyes of God, at which point a tremor registering 8.5 on the Richter scale ripped the earth asunder and Davenport's inhabitants were swallowed by a widening chasm, where they found themselves eviscerated on the fiery spears of 10 million shrieking demons. [Continue reading]

A mother's take on her daughter's anti-bullying program

Written by an anonymous author and published at The Public Discourse -- an excerpt:

I have nothing against organizations working with other groups in order to determine how they might best approach school problems like bullying. In fact, work needs to be done on many fronts to prevent school bullying, which can result in alienation, depression, or even suicide among our youth.

But this bullying awareness program claimed to do something else: to celebrate diversity. Upon further investigation, celebrating diversity turned out to be a celebration of moral relativism: the shallow and self-satisfied yet insidious and contradictory sort of relativism that, while paying homage to “liberty” (read: indeterminate self-fulfillment), and “equality” (read: the leveling of all differences and distinctions including natural ones), undermines and replaces religious and other traditional views of morality.

Instead of being taught the necessity of distinguishing between noble and base or right and wrong, our children are told at a tender age to be equally open to all ways of life on the grounds that all values are subjective. I wondered if the real intention of the classes on diversity for students my daughter’s age was to prevent in the future any principled opposition to homosexuality: the organization was attempting to get children, once cast out in the murky waters of relativism and left stranded without a moral or spiritual compass with which to orient themselves, to blindly accept homosexuality on equal footing with traditional sexuality. Being taught that all lifestyle choices are conventional and acceptable and based on an individual’s right to self-definition and self-expression would likely confuse my daughter, either sapping the strength from her own religious and moral convictions in the future or, even worse, preventing them from ever taking root.

Video: Drag Queens for Gay Marriage Stop Rush Hour Traffic in NYC

Three drag queens and four or five other gay folks block off sixth avenue in New York during rush hour to make a point on March 1st:

The organizers said it took place simply because it was the first day of March: "We plan to do something every month until we have full marriage equality."

Recent Polls Showing Strong Majorities Oppose SSM

MORE DATA:

The PPI poll is the only one of these which uses an automated response system. We suspect that given recent election results opposing gay marriage--and also the hatred now directed at people who stand up for marriage--that this may be the most accurate gauge of actual sentiment.

We suspect gay rights groups agree with this, which is why they remain adamantly opposed to letting the people vote, even as they try to claim majority support for redefining marriage.

If the Majority Supports SSM, Why Won't They Let the People of Rhode Island Vote?

Not even the gay rights folks believe that new poll. If the majority of Americans now support gay marriage, why is the gay rights lobby vigorously opposing a proposal to refer the question to an open vote of the people of Rhode Island?

The answer given in the Warwick Beacon yesterday was: because they are afraid they will lose.

In Rhode Island. One of the most Democratic states in the nation.

What does that say about public opinion elsewhere?

Brian Brown responds to WaPo Poll: "The Only Poll That Counts is a Free and Fair Vote of the People"

Brian Brown is quoted in a new Washington Post story this morning:

"Slim majority back gay marriage, Post-ABC poll says"

... Opponents of same-sex marriage took issue with the poll, which asks respondents: “Do you think it should be legal or illegal for gay and lesbian couples to get married?” Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage, argued that the term “illegal” could be inferred to mean that violators could be imprisoned, which most Americans would consider harsh.

Brown, whose group is a prominent anti-gay-marriage group, noted that all 31 states that have put same-sex marriage on the ballot voted to ban it.

“The only poll that counts is a free and fair vote on the part of the people,” he said. “We’ve seen these biased polls time and time again -- right before votes in which same-sex marriage is rejected. It’s absurd. The people of this country have not changed their opinion about marriage.”

Pseudo Catholic and Protestant groups funded by Gay Billionaires

Thomas Peters has published a list of the almost $700,000 in grants the Arcus Foundation (run by Tim Gill's friends) has given to groups dedicated to introducing more "diversity" into the Catholic Church's teaching on sexuality and marriage in the past few years. These groups present themselves as the authentic voice of the Catholic laity. But following the money shows that they are front groups for the same-old, same-old secular gay rights groups.

The total amount Arcus has given to groups tasked with doing the same operations among Protestant denominations is almost $6,500,000.

In other words, a whole lot of secular gay money is flowing into so-called pro-equality religious groups.

Breaking News: RI Speaker Gordon Fox Concedes Gay Marriage Bill in Limbo

According to the March 17 Warwick Beacon story "Marriage Bill in Limbo", House Speaker Gordon Fox's spokesman conceded there is no immediate plan for the House Judiciary Committee to vote on gay marriage; he says he doubts the bill will be moved until "some sort of concession can be reached."

The Beacon says only two courses are now under consideration: substitute a civil unions bill, or put the issue before the voters on the 2012 ballot.

However gay marriage advocates "oppose those measures because they say same-sex couples should have the full rights of marriage and they fear a referendum could result in defeat."

"Legislators interviewed for this story," writes the Beacon, "saw no other course for the bill, short of letting it die in the House or passing it and facing possible defeat in the Senate, than replacing the word marriage or bringing it to the voters."

Warwick-Cranston Rep. Joseph McNamara remains adamant against letting the people vote:

“Do you think the rest of the bus would have voted to let Rosa Parks sit in the front seat when she did?” he told the Beacon.

He also said National Organization for Marriage (NOM)'s mailer to his constituents "stirred up a lot of hatred."

But as McNamara, who is a Catholic, sees it, “I represent all the constituents, not just the ones who look like me.”

We wonder what about the ones who look like this?

But another Warwick legislator Joseph Trillo told the Beacon he will oppose gay marriage:

“That word is taken,” he said of marriage.

(photo: www.projo.com)

Turning the Tides in the State Marriage Battles - NOM's National Newsletter

Happy St. Patrick's Day!

St. Patrick's Day

We're still digesting the great victory for marriage in Maryland.

Many thanks to each of you who wrote, picked up the phone, sent an email, went down to Annapolis, and/or reached down and gave generously to support NOM's work in Maryland and across the country.

Stopping SSM in Maryland: "A Huge Victory"

Here's how the Baptist Press put it: "It was a huge victory for traditionalists. Just two weeks ago, the bill seemed destined to become law."

MD Aftermath Brings Infighting in Gay Marriage Camp

We're still digesting that great Maryland victory for marriage and boy, so is the other side. The name-calling has begun!

Hispanic Church Turning the Tide in Rhode Island

All eyes are now on Rhode Island, where House Speaker Gordon Fox is claiming he has the votes to pass a gay marriage bill through the House. Right.

Is Suppressing Religious Liberty the Point of SSM Bills?

Here's something else worth noticing from Maryland and Rhode Island: In both states, gay-marriage advocates would rather lose gay marriage than provide religious liberty protections.

We keep piling up victory after improbable victory together, demonstrating once again what a special God-blessed country we live in.

The good news keeps coming: We expect a marriage amendment to pass in Indiana soon.

Charles Cooper

Chuck Cooper and the Prop 8 litigation team just
filed a very strong brief (PDF)to the California Supreme Court, demonstrating that the proponents of the a ballot initiative committee do have a special legal status to speak on behalf of the initiative.

We will never give up this fight, because we will never surrender the truth about marriage and the dignity of the human person, and we will never surrender our rights as Americans in the democratic process.

Pres. Obama may try to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, but we will be there to stop him. You and I know: Pres. Obama cannot repeal the truth, the natural law, or common sense.

Thank you for helping us fight this great fight.

God bless you and God bless this great, great nation!

Brian brown

Brian S. Brown

President

National Organization for Marriage

P.S. We spent more than $125,000 in robocalls and mailers to help Maryland citizens fight off gay marriage. We have similar battles to fight right now in Rhode Island, Minnesota, Indiana, North Carolina, New York, and now in Congress to protect DOMA. If you are able, would you prayerfully consider donating $10 this week to help us fight for God's truth about marriage? Your gift of $5, $50, or $500will be faithfully stewarded to win more victories for marriage, for democracy and for religious liberty!

Can Crystal Cathedral Run Its Own Church or Does It Need USAToday's Permission?

The Crystal Cathedral (the home base for the international Crystal Cathedral Ministries), with a congregation of over 10,000 members in Orange County, CA recently asked its choir members, who are considered part of its ministry, to commit to basic Christian principles, and to acknowledge that the Crystal Cathedral teaches the mainstream Christian idea that sex is reserved for marriage between a husband and wife.

USA Today, the SF Chronicle and the OC Register are shocked, shocked to find Christianity going on at a cathedral!

Photo: Chris Carlson, AP

Maggie's latest column: "The Launch of Muscular Liberalism"

Available on Yahoo! News:

Last month, facing the problem of Muslim assimilation, British Prime Minister David Cameron denounced multiculturalism and called for a new "muscular liberalism" as the basis for a shared national identity.

Applauding conservatives, beware.

For Cameron's new liberal muscles were pumped this week at Owen and Eunice Johns, whose religious objections to homosexuality were used to bar them from becoming foster parents.

I wrote about this case recently, but Cameron's comments call renewed attention to the underlying dynamic now being launched in the Western world: the end of liberal multiculturalism and the launch of liberal monoculturalism. It's not a pretty sight. [Continue reading]

Shocked Reaction of Pro-SSM Advocates to MD Defeat: The Name Calling Begins

We've already talked about this theme today, but here are even more examples:

Ed Brayton at ScienceBlogs: "We certainly shouldn't be surprised that the "faith" of black churches is any different from the "faith" of white ones, often "telling" someone to do something that violates the rights of others. But you'd sure wish that black people, of all people, would have learned the lessons of history better than that."

Kevin Naff at the WashingtonBlade: "...lawmakers aren’t willing to take a stand and face down their ignorant (and often closeted) pastors. They run in fear of Fox News’s blowhards and NOM’s $1 million war chest. They are cowards and don’t deserve our support for re-election."

Jonathan Capehart at the Washington Post: "Y’all saw me open a vein on the treachery of Del. Sam Arora... And then there was that other spineless profile in courage, Del. Tiffany T. Alston."

Video: SSM = "Economic Development" plan, gay advocates say

Rhode Island gay marriage advocates are claiming gay marriage is part of an "economic development" plan for Rhode Island. This has been a major talking point of Gov. Lincoln Chafee.

Video source: www.golocalprov.com