NOM BLOG

Monthly Archives: July 2012

Tea Party Activist: Chick-Fil-A Struggle is about Freedom

Judson Phillips at Tea Party Nation:

"...This is a battle about freedom.  The left always screams that we must be tolerant of their beliefs but when is the left ever tolerant of someone who disagrees with them.  The left has repeatedly tried to shut down conservatives from Rush, to Beck to Fox News and the list goes on.

Liberals, like Boston’s idiot in chief, do not want anyone to have a choice.  They do not want anyone to disagree with them.   Liberals would prefer to silence those who disagree with them.  Liberals like Boston’s wannabe dictator would prefer a dictatorship where they can simply rule and if you disagree with them, they’ll put you in jail.

We must stand up for Chic fil A.  I encourage everyone to stop by Chic fil A and have a meal there or at least get some of their great iced tea.

When you do, tell them you are a supporter of the Tea Party and you stand with Chic fil A and stand for freedom."

Just a reminder that Wednesdays are Eat More Chikin day!

Gov. O'Malley, Whose Top Priority Was SSM, Leads Nation in Job Loss

Mismatched priorities?

AP

Maryland has lost more jobs so far this year than any other state in the nation according to the U.S. Department of Labor. After last Friday's release of June state unemployment figures, there is now six months of data with which to compare the states. Maryland, which lost just over 10,000 jobs since the beginning of this year, is among a dozen states to have experienced declines during this period.

"This is a very disturbing trend, which needs to be addressed," said Change Maryland Chairman Larry Hogan. "I'm deeply concerned that state government's onslaught of taxes and fees is causing us to lose businesses, jobs and taxpayers at an alarming rate." Maryland has raised taxes and fees 24 times since 2007, removing an additional $2.4 billion from the economy annually.

...A comparison frequently made on all sides of the political spectrum is between Maryland and Virginia. Maryland's unemployment rate, at 6.9%, contrasts sharply with Virginia's 5.7%. This is the widest gap between the two states since 2001, when Parris Glendening was governor. -- The Baynet

Lawyer Group Backs Minnesota Marriage Amendment

The Minnesota Lawyer:

"...a group of attorneys working to get the amendment passed has been adding members and rolling out a campaign of its own. Lawyers for Marriage, a group affiliated with larger Minnesotans for Marriage, formed last month.

About 40 attorneys have joined, and organizers expect more to step forward. The group plans to do outreach, public speaking, and serve as a resource for attorneys and other Minnesotans on the Vote Yes campaign.

Kevin Conneely, the group’s chairman and an attorney at Leonard Street and Deinard in Minneapolis, freely admits that if it wasn’t for the number of high profile lawyers with “lofty titles” who have recently made public statements against the amendment, his group might not exist.

He said he’s against law firms making public stands on either side of the issue and believes the debate in legal circles could be more civil. Members of his group are as dedicated in their beliefs as those on the other side, Conneely said. The response from legal professionals, including those in outstate Minnesota, has been positive, he said.

“People on both sides of this issue should be able to talk freely about it, and we can disagree, but I think as lawyers we have a special role to play to help the public learn about the issue and about how a constitutional amendment works in our state. As a profession, we can’t appear to be partisan,” he said. “We can be a place where like-minded attorneys can go without trading on their firm name.”

Top Sociologist Christian Smith Defends Regnerus Study

Christian Smith, the William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for the Study of Religion and Society and the Center for Social Research at the University of Notre Dame writes in the Chronicle of Higher Education:

Whoever said inquisitions and witch hunts were things of the past? A big one is going on now. The sociologist Mark Regnerus, at the University of Texas at Austin, is being smeared in the media and subjected to an inquiry by his university over allegations of scientific misconduct.

Regnerus's offense? His article in the July 2012 issue of Social Science Research reported that adult children of parents who had same-sex romantic relationships, including same-sex couples as parents, have more emotional and social problems than do adult children of heterosexual parents with intact marriages. That's it. Regnerus published ideologically unpopular research results on the contentious matter of same-sex families. And now he is being made to pay.

... The very integrity of the social-science research process is threatened by the public smearing and vigilante media attacks we have seen in this case. Sociology's progressive orthodoxy and the semicovert activism it prompts threaten the intellectual vitality of the discipline, the quality of undergraduate education, and public trust in academe. Reasonable people cannot allow social-science scholarship to be policed and selectively punished by the forces of activist ideology and politics, from any political quarter. University leaders must resist the manipulation of research review committees by nonacademic culture warriors who happen not to like certain findings.

Science already has its own ways to deal with controversial research results. Studies should be replicated. Data sets should be made public and reanalyzed. And new and better studies should be conducted. Eventually the truth comes out. By those means, Regnerus might be shown to have been wrong or perhaps be vindicated. That is how science is supposed to work.

By contrast, political attacks like those on Regnerus are contemptible and hurt everyone in the long run, including progressives. Everybody—especially officials at the University of Texas at Austin—needs to be vigilant in protecting scholars and their research against those inside and outside of academe who seek to silence scholars whose research runs counter to the current orthodoxy.

NY Dems Grumble: Why Are Republicans Getting All the Pro-SSM Money?

Capital City & State's theNotebook blog:

Some prominent supporters of same-sex marriage have donated money to State Sens. Shirley Huntley and Joe Addabbo, Democrats who switched their “no” votes to “yeses” when the bill passed last year, but were not the beneficiaries of donor largesse like the four Republican senators who voted in favor of the bill.

...As Ken Lovett reported in May,

“Twenty-nine Democrats vote yes, and the four Republicans are getting all the money,” one political operative groused. “So much for the (gay) community standing up for those who stood up for them.”

Welcome to DumpGeneralMills.com!

Email Header Image

Dear Marriage Supporter,

Welcome! Thank you so much for taking the DumpGeneralMills.com pledge. You and more than 23,000 other Americans are standing up to General Mills and letting them know we think they should be selling cereal—not pushing gay marriage! Your help in sending this important message is greatly appreciated!

I'm Jonathan Baker, head of the National Organization for Marriage's Corporate Fairness Project. We launched the DumpGeneralMills.com campaign so that you, as an individual consumer, could join thousands of your fellow marriage supporters in telling General Mills to back off from their assault on marriage. Individually we may not have much influence; but together we can make our support for marriage heard.

With your permission, I'd like to share with you the latest developments in this campaign, recent news items and stories from people like you who are making their voices heard. (You can opt out of these news updates anytime you like—simply go to the bottom of any of our emails and click unsubscribe.)

Supporting and defending marriage is a joint effort: we cannot do this alone. We need your help to spread the word to your friends, family, and community. Toward this end, we will include in each newsletter one idea of an easy action that you can take to spread the word of the DumpGeneralMills.com protest.

Let me share with you part of the story of one DumpGeneralMills.com supporter who has joined her fellow citizens in protesting outside General Mills' corporate headquarters. Her full letter was published in the Minnesota Star Tribune.

Recently, I was one of the many protesters outside the General Mills corporate offices and spoke to the company's vice president of communications. I asked why a company like his would ever come out with a statement against the marriage amendment. His response was that the issue had been thought about for some time. My view is that when the media asked the company to state its position on this issue quite often, then monthly, then weekly, the company succumbed to the pressure and made this uninformed statement.

...So many people in this democracy believe in the strong foundation of a marriage between a man and a woman; it is incomprehensible that a large company that markets many of its products to children would choose this position.

A company should be interested in a good product and sales. It can make all the cereals and products it wants, but if there are no buyers, it will fail. General Mills, please choose mother, father, children in the future.

What you can do to help:

 

Tell your spouse, your children, or your best friend about how General Mills is opposing traditional marriage, and encourage them to join you in signing the DumpGeneralMills.com pledge.

Thank you so much again for caring about God's vision of marriage! We look forward to your continuing help in our work to support marriage and hold public corporations accountable for their assault on the family.

Boston Mayor Promises to Stop Chick-Fil-A Opening In Town

After SSM, what next? Banning family-owned companies that believe in marriage:

The mayor of Boston is vowing to block Chick-fil-A from opening a restaurant in the city after the company's president spoke out publicly against gay marriage.

Mayor Thomas Menino told the Boston Herald on Thursday that he doesn't want a business in the city "that discriminates against a population."

Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy told the Baptist Press this week that his privately owned company is "guilty as charged" in support of what he called the biblical definition of the family.

The fast-food chicken sandwich chain later said that it strives to "treat every person with honor, dignity and respect — regardless of their belief, race, creed, sexual orientation or gender."

Atlanta-based Chick-fil-A has more than 1,600 stores nationwide but just two in Massachusetts, both located in suburban malls. - AP

The Boston Herald relays Mayor Menino's exact words:

“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion,” Menino told the Herald yesterday.

“That’s the Freedom Trail. That’s where it all started right here. And we’re not going to have a company, Chick-fil-A or whatever the hell the name is, on our Freedom Trail.”

Washington State Blogger: New Poll Looks Bad for Gay Marriage

Dominic Holden is a pro-SSM blogger who is deeply concerned by the new SurveyUSA poll showing barely a majority support redefining marriage -- and as we know, redefining marriage always loses support when citizens are finally given the privacy of the voting booth:

I've heard lots of people say recently that passing gay marriage this fall is going to be an easy-peasy slam dunk. Think again. Even though US voters are increasingly supportive of marriage equality and even though our legislature passed it fairly easily last winter, the latest polling from SurveyUSA shows only 50 percent of voters in Washington State support it:

This is not good. Going into an election with less than 55 percent support is considered a dicey gamble. But the poll released this week shows gay marriage doesn't even have a majority of support, which means that opponents need only keep the 7 percent of undecided voters afraid and peel off a fraction of support to defeat the measure in November. And while other polls have shown it doing slightly better—ranging from 47 percent to 54 percent—all of them show losing would be easy. After all, in Maine in 2009, marriage equality was narrowly leading in the polls before being defeated by a six-point margin on election day.

If the pro-SSM side is worried these means the pro-marriage side should be encouraged. Winning for marriage is possible if the needed resources and volunteers are brought together. Find out what you can do to help at PreserveMarriageWashington.

235 Republicans & 17 Democrats Vote to Prevent Violations of DOMA

The Hill:

The House has approved an amendment to the 2013 defense spending bill that would prohibit the Department of Defense from using any money in the bill to violate the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). 

The amendment, from Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), was approved 247-166, one of dozens of amendments the House was considering before approving the entire bill late Thursday night. The amendment was supported by 17 Democrats, and just five Republicans opposed it.

King said the language, similar versions of which have passed the House before, is needed because of President Obama's growing support for same-sex marriage. King said that support is permeating the federal government.

... DOD issued memos last year saying certain military facilities might be used for same-sex marriage, and that military chaplains may officiate in same-sex marriages. King said those policy changes violate DOMA, under which the federal government recognizes marriage as being between a man and a woman.

"Pretty simple statute being contravened by the directives of the president of the United States as exercised through the secretary of Defense," King said.

New SurveyUSA Poll: Minnesota Marriage Amendment Up 15 Points!

A new SurveyUSA poll gives a great deal of hope to pro-marriage advocates in Minnesota:

An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution on the ballot defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Will you vote FOR the amendment? Against the amendment? Or not vote on the measure? 

Vote For: 52%
Vote Against: 37%
Not Vote: 5%
Not Sure: 6%

The crosstabs are also encouraging:

Men support the Amendment: 53%-37%
Women support: 52%-36%
Age 18-34 support: 50%-44%
Independents support: 48%-42%
Twin Cities supports: 49%-40%

Join the fight at MinnesotaForMarriage.

DNC Chair Says She Expects Gay Marriage Plank in Party Platform

Predictions for what will happen at the DNC convention in North Carolina from the party's chair:

Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida in the U.S. House of Representatives, told PGN this week that she expects marriage equality to be a plank of the party’s platform, which will be finalized at the Democratic National Convention Sept. 3-6 in Charlotte, N.C. PGN interviewed Wasserman Schultz, particularly about what LGBTs can expect from Democrats in the short and long term. -- Philadelphia Gay News

The evidence suggests that at least a plurality of Democrats in North Carolina voted for their Marriage Protection Amendment this May.

Canadian B&B Owners Order to Pay Gay Couple $4,500 in "Damages"

LifeSiteNews:

Christian owners of a bed and breakfast in British Columbia have been ordered to pay around $4,500 in damages after they refused to rent a room to a homosexual couple.

Brian Thomas and Shaun Eadie had reserved a room at the Riverbend B&B in Grand Forks in June 2009, but owners Les and Susan Molnar cancelled the reservation after realizing they were homosexual.

“To allow a gay couple to share a bed in my Christian home would violate my Christian beliefs and would cause me and my wife great distress,” Lee explained in tribunal documents.

Thomas and Eadie filed a complaint with the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, which ruled in their favour on Tuesday. Tribunal member Enid Marion ordered the Molnars to “cease and desist the discriminatory conduct,” though they closed the B&B down in September 2009 as a result of the incident.

Marion agreed with the two men that the Molnars violated section 8 of the B.C. Human Rights Code, which states that it is a discriminatory practice to “deny to a person or class of persons any accommodation” because of “sexual orientation.”

NRO on the "Gay-Parenting Witch Hunt"

Robert Verbruggen, deputy managing editor of National Review:

"...The complaint [against Prof. Regnerus], summarized in a breathless open letter to the university’s president, was filed by Scott Rose, a New York City–based novelist and freelance writer. Rose does not allege serious ethical misconduct, such as plagiarism or falsifying data. Rather, the letter’s only concrete allegation that Regnerus violated an official policy is a contention that Regnerus used “misinformation in an attempt to hurt others.”

... Rose makes much of the fact that the research was funded by conservative groups. Surely this is one thing to bear in mind when evaluating the study. But it is not at all uncommon or unethical for political organizations to fund research. And if Rose thinks gay parenting should not be studied with financial support from interested parties, perhaps he would like to file complaints against researchers who’ve accepted money from the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, the Lesbian Health Fund, the Gill Foundation, and the Horizons Foundation as well.

... Every study deserves rigorous and passionate criticism. Regnerus’s work is no exception. But the ethics complaint against him is frivolous, and the university should dismiss it.

Reforming Divorce: Changing Laws to Preserve Families

Deseret news:

"...advocates now hope to lower divorce rates through laws that slow the process — with some exceptions — and encourage couples who are waiting to use opportunities to improve communication and relational skills and hopefully reconsider.

Divorce-reform advocates are battling a cultural bias created by 40 years of legal precedent, concerns about increasing governmental involvement in private lives and the cost of seeking help. But they say this needs to be discussed to avoid more unnecessary pain.

... A 2008 study on the costs of divorce and unwed childbearing estimated that family fragmentation costs taxpayers $112 billion annually for things like food stamps, housing assistance, child welfare services and the justice system.

In a 2005 article in "The Future of Children," University of Pennsylvania sociologist Paul Amato explained that if children were to grow up in stable two-parent families at the same level as 1960 before the massive increase in divorce, it would mean 1.2 million fewer children suspended from school, 538,000 fewer acts of delinquency and 71,400 fewer suicide attempts.

SSM Flip-Flopper McDonald Furiously Spending Money to Fend Off Conservative Challenge

From the Albany Times Union Capital Confidential blog, proof that Sen. McDonald knows his re-election chances are in danger because of his vote for gay marriage:

Sen. Roy McDonald, R-Saratoga, spent $365,081 over the last six months — quite a burn rate for this early in the cycle. McDonald appears to be paying three campaign staffers, and also spent $20,000 to retain Bill Powers & Associates. Powers was the former chairman of the Rensselaer County GOP and Republican State Committee. McDonald’s committee also paid $10,000 to Hudson Valley Strategies, the political consulting company run by Rensselaer County Legislature spokesman Rich Crist.

– McDonald also used his campaign money to pay small donations to various charities in the region, likely tied to some kind of event or gala. They range from the Lansigburgh Boys & Girls Club to the Saratoga Senior Center.

– McDonald paid $22,500 for a poll by Public Opinion Strategies on April 24, roughly a month after Saratoga County Clerk Kathy Marchione announced her candidacy against him.

– The campaign spent $119.25 at The Snowman, an ice cream stand in Lansingburgh where $119.25 gets you A LOT of frozen treats.

– As he criss-crossed the new district pitching party committees for their endorsement, McDonald spread around some cash. He donated $4,500 to the New York State Independence Party, which has given him its line; $1,000 to the Troy Republican Committee, which endorsed him; $1,000 to the Columbia County Republican Committee, whose chair endorsed him; $1,000 to the Columbia County Conservative Party, which endorsed him and helped carry petitions for Edward Gilbert, who McDonald’s aides deny any connection with, and $2,000 to the Saratoga Springs Republican Committee, which endorsed him.