NOM BLOG

Monthly Archives: September 2011

NY Press Takes Note of NOM Billboard Campaign Against Pro-SSM Senators; "This is Not Going to End" Brian Brown Vows

The Capital Confidential:

This simple but cutting message has gone up on Rt. 40 in Schaghiticoke, Rensselaer County, just in time for the county fair there:

The New York Daily News adds much more:

The National Organization for Marriage plans to place billboards in the districts of four GOP state senators who broke ranks and voted to legalize gay marriage in June.

"Roy McDonald, You're Fired," screams the group's first billboard, which went up recently in the district of Albany-area Sen. Roy McDonald.

"This is not going to end," vowed NOM President Brian Brown, who said the group is spending about $40,000 on the initial run of billboards.

In the coming weeks, the group hopes to have billboards in the districts of Sens. Mark Grisanti of Buffalo, Stephen Saland of Dutchess County and James Alesi of upstate Monroe County.

The billboards are the latest salvo in the marriage group's ongoing campaign to defeat pro-same-sex senators in the 2012 election - and ultimately force a statewide referendum on the issue.

In July, the group spent $150,000 on mailings targeting voters in districts of senators who supported gay marriage.

"This is what this campaign is going to be from here on out," Brown said. "We are not going to rest until the people of this state get a vote."

Learn more about our campaign (and how you can help) right here.

"Bordering on Bigotry" -- CNN's Piers Morgan Attacks Santorum's Marriage Beliefs

LifeSiteNews:

In the course of drilling Rick Santorum on homosexuality, CNN’s Piers Morgan accused the presidential candidate’s views of “bordering on bigotry” and challenged him as a fellow Catholic with different beliefs on the issue.

... “I had Piers Morgan call me a bigot, because I believe what the Catholic Church teaches with respect to homosexuality. I’m a ‘bigot’!” Santorum exclaimed.

“And, of course, we don’t elect bigots to office, we don’t give them professional licenses, we don’t give them preferential tax treatment. If you’re a preacher and you preach bigoted things, you think you’re going to be allowed to have a 501(c)3 as a church? Of course not.”

The exchange was picked up on the Catholic blogosphere, where commentators criticized Morgan for targeting the basic tenets of the Catholic Catechism.

Video: Weprin Questioned by Voter on His SSM Vote

Via Capital New York:

In a conversation captured on video, a man recently asked David Weprin how, as an Orthodox Jew, he could vote to legalize same-sex marriage. (The man also raised hypothetical problems faced by "catering halls" that may have to comply with the new law.)

Yeshiva World: "Can Weprin Represent Orthodox Jewish Views?"

Dave Hirsch is a political analyst and columnist who penned this op-ed in the Yeshiva World:

David Weprin deserves credit for his past commitment to the Jewish community; yet, the placing of his career and party before his faith is troubling and makes him the wrong contender for this position. His loyalty to the liberal stance of his party in place of his religion makes him a constant embarrassment for the constituents who ardently uphold the laws and customs of their belief. How can their conviction allow a person who practices Judaism, yet berated the core values in public, represent them and their values? How can they be at ease when a person rebukes his rabbi for upholding the Jewish values to the members of his community?

Marriage Takes Center Stage in Presidential Debate

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: September 5, 2011
Elizabeth Ray or Mary Beth Hutchins at 703-683-5004

Top Candidates Commit to Pick VP Nominee Who Supports Traditional Marriage

"Every GOP candidate has said that he or she personally believes that marriage is between a man and a woman, and each of the leading candidates has signed NOM's Marriage Pledge."

- Brian Brown, President of NOM -

WASHINGTON, DC - All the Republican candidates for president appearing at today's South Carolina debate today who were asked about their vice presidential nominee pledged to pick someone who shares their strong support for traditional marriage. The commitments were made at the Palmetto Freedom Forum Presidential Debate in South Carolina by Mitt Romney, Michelle Bachmann and Herman Cain. Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul also attended the debate, but they were not asked about their VP pick.

"Supporters of marriage as the union of one man and one woman saw an informed, dedicated field of presidential candidates not only express their own personal support for traditional marriage, but the three who were asked all pledged to pick a VP nominee who similarly is dedicated to preserving marriage as the union of one man and one woman," said Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). "Along with Rick Perry and Rick Santorum who did not attend the debate, this is the strongest pro-marriage demonstration by presidential candidates that we have witnessed in years. Every GOP candidate has said that he or she personally believes that marriage is between a man and a woman, and each of the leading candidates has signed NOM's Marriage Pledge."

NOM's Marriage Pledge has been signed by Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum, and previously was signed by Tim Pawlenty. Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich have not signed the pledge. It commits the candidates to support a federal amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman, appointing Supreme Court Justices and an Attorney General who will apply the original meaning of the Constitution, vigorously defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act in court, establish a presidential commission on religious liberty, and advance legislation to return to the people of the District of Columbia their right to vote on marriage.

"NOM commends these candidates for their personal leadership on marriage and for committing to appoint a vice presidential nominee who similarly is committed to taking concrete action in office to preserve marriage as the union of one man and one woman," Brown said. "We commend the debate organizers, American Principles Project, for structuring a presentation that allowed the candidates to discuss issues in depth and to field insightful questions from a panel of conservative leaders.

NOM's founding Chairman, Robert George, joined US Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) and Congressman Steve King (R-IA) in questioning the presidential candidates in the South Carolina debate.

To schedule an interview with Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for Marriage, please contact Elizabeth Ray, [email protected], (x130) or Mary Beth Hutchins, [email protected], (x105) at 703-683-5004.

###

Roy McDonald: You're Fired!

We Pledge $2 Million to Reverse SSM in New York - Will You Stand With Us?

Dear Marriage Supporter,

What a day! Over ten thousand of you rallied across the state of New York to vow that we would hold accountable the legislators who betrayed marriage and settle for nothing less than a vote of the people on marriage.

The rallies were the beginning of a new movement, a new coalition of people of every race, color, creed, and political party coming together to protect marriage in New York.

Working together with Senator Ruben Diaz, Radio Vision Cristiana, Bishop Mattera, New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and leaders across the state we had a historic rally for marriage. But now we need to take the next steps.

We have been working hard to make sure that the Let the People Vote coalition would grow in the weeks following the rally. And it has done just that. We currently have four regional committees across the state representing hundreds of thousand of New Yorkers.

At the rallies we said we would give you concrete actions you could take every month to fight for marriage.

Billboard

Well, yesterday NOM PAC NY launched the first of many billboards across the state holding legislators accountable.

Already the billboard is getting attention as the state fair begins. As you can see, the message is simple. We will hold accountable those legislators who betrayed marriage.

Local leaders came to us and helped fund this billboard. Would you like also like to see billboards in all of the legislators districts who betrayed marriage? Well you can make it happen. For the next month whatever money NOM PAC NY collects will go to this billboard drive. And if you donate we will match your donation to get as many billboards as possible up throughout the state.

That's what I'm asking you this month. Help us get a billboard up in your district holding you legislator accountable.

Donate now by clicking here...

Contribute

Semper fi,

Brian Brown

Brian S Brown

Brian S. Brown
President
National Organization for Marriage

P.S. We'll have a big announcement next week on other next steps. But in the meantime, please consider helping us get billboards up across the state holding those who betrayed us accountable. God bless.

NOM To Co-Host Social Issues Iowa Forum with GOP Presidential Candidates

The Des Moines Register:

Republican presidential candidates will gather ’round the table at Thanksgiving-time in Des Moines.

The Family Leader, an Iowa-based conservative Christian advocacy group, is sponsoring a “Thanksgiving Family Forum” in November that will bring together several of the contestants in next year’s Iowa caucuses.

Candidates Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum have already RSVP’d for the event, and Rick Perry, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich have been invited.

The event will not be a formal debate, but will feature a moderator leading a discussion with the candidates about “issues affecting the family.”

The event is scheduled for Nov. 19 — less than three months ahead of the first-in-the-nation caucuses — at the First Federated Church in Des Moines. Organizers expect about 2,500 attendees...

CitizenLink and the National Organization for Marriage are cosponsoring the event. All the groups focus on social conservative issues like opposition to abortion and gay marriage.

Grading the Candidates: Mitt Romney

[Watch the debate live online here.]

Prof. George begins: "Courts usurped the authority of Congress and acted in a way that removed an entire class of human beings from the law's protection. Lincoln said that if this is accepted "the people will cease to be their own rulers." After Lincoln's death we enacted the 14th amendment. Many people say we need to wait for Roe v. Wade to be reversed but Section 5 of the 14th gives Congress the right to enforce the guarantees of equal protection and due process. Would you propose to Congress legislation to protect life in all stages?" Mitt Romney responds [paraphrase]:

"I would support justices who support the Constitution and would return that power to the states. Is there a constitutional path to have Congress say we will push aside the decision of the Supreme Court, and return to the states or pass their own values -- that would create a constitutional crisis. That might happen but that wouldn't be something I would precipitate. I would look for people on the Supreme Court who will interpret the Constitution, not impose their own values. I'm not looking to creating a constitutional crisis. I would live within the law, the Constitution as I understand it without creating a constitutional crisis..."

George: Will your Veep share your pro-life, pro-marriage views?

Romney: "I certainly imagine so, I haven't made any selections in that regard, I would expect they would all be pro-life and pro-traditional marriage. I think its presumptuous to think of who my Veep would be at this stage. These are important enough issues that the person I select would share my views."

George: [question about federal money going to states that discriminate against organizations that follow their religious convictions.]

Romney: "I believe in religious tolerance and religious liberty. That means to me we are not going to force people of faith to violate their faith in order to practice their professions ...I'm not one of those who says get rid of the conscience protections and [force people to do things that violate their faith.]

I would say in [Massachusetts] about half of adoptions were being placed by Catholic Charities because they would not place children in homes with same-sex couples.

That's a mistake, we should permit people to apply their faith, [especially when there are many other agencies who can deliver services]."

Grading Mitt Romney: B+

Grading the Candidates: Ron Paul

[Watch the debate live online here.]

Prof. George: "Power delegated to national government by Section 5 of the 14th Amendment. You have a strong and consistent pro-life record in Congress. Whether in view of those delegated powers, would you propose to Congress legislation to protect life in all stages, or would you have to wait for Roe. v. Wade to be reversed by the Supreme Court?" Congressman Paul answers [paraphrase]:

"No I wouldn't wait, I would remove the federal jurisdiction from the courts so the states could immediately do what they want. The 14th Amendment [contravenes] the 9th and 10th Amendment. There are people who use the 14th Amendment to do almost anything they want. The 14th Amendment has been used to increase the size and scope of government."

Prof. George responds: "The language is clear, you cannot deny 'life or liberty' without due process of law."

Ron Paul: "Murder should be a state issue."

Prof. George: "If the state removed protection against murder from a class of human beings, or the newly born, or the handicapped newborn, wouldn't that call for action at the national level?"

Ron Paul: "If you want to stretch your interpretation and stretch the power of the federal government. ...I can understand your argument but I think it rejects the notion that states are part of our government. When we can, and we can, we have done it all our history, we can deal with violence and murder, it's a state issue, I don't see why it should be a federal issue ...you are asking for more policeman at the federal level. I don't understand why we've met so much resistance from removing the jurisdiction from Congress. You could do it by a majority vote with the president signing it, you don't have to wait for Roe V. Wade to be repealed."

Grading Ron Paul: Marriage questions weren't asked, so I'm going to give Paul a pass.

Rating the Candidates: Newt Gingrich

[Watch the debate live online here.]

Newt gets extra credit for giving Dr. George a shout-out at the beginning on the Manhattan Declaration: "What Dr. George began with the Manhattan statement to re-center American culture is very important ...this is very important." From his opening remarks:

"Always a citizen, never a subject. A set of truths about the nature of being human. We are human within a fabric created by God. These rights are inalienable. Which means no politician, no bureaucrat, no judge can take them away from you ...we are in grave danger of descending from being citizens into being subjects."

Dr. George: "Pres. Lincoln's First Inaugural, he spoke of the court usurping the authority of the people on slavery. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment authorizes Congress to enforce the guarantees of equal protection and due process. Would you as President propose legislation to protect life?" Speaker Gingrich answers [paraphrase]:

Yes. But there are five other issues. There are a number of issues on which the courts have usurped the people's power. Jefferson wrote that the Supreme Court unimpeded would be "an oligarchy." This is the center of American exceptionalism. We are a people of law. To be a people of law you have to have a structure. By a 5-4 vote appointed lawyers can be the equivalent of a Constitutional Convention ...we are going to have a big fight with the lawyer class. Jefferson in 1802 passes judicial reform act which eliminates judges ...I am not as bold as Thomas Jefferson. I would no more than eliminate Judge Berry in San Antonio and the 9th Circuit ...that's not a rhetorical comment. The executive branches have an obligation to defend the Constitution against judges who are tyrannical."

Gingrich on marriage:

"I support a constitutional amendment on marriage. We have every right to defend a 3,000-year clear record [on what marriage is] and I don't think we should be intimidated against [defending it]."

Grading Newt Gingrich: "B"

Rating the Candidates: Herman Cain

[Watch the debate live online here.]

Prof. George leads off: "Does Congress have the power under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to enforce the equal protection of unborn life?" Cain responds (paraphrase):

"Yes I could support that. I would challenge the U.S. Congress to do its job. The president has the responsibility to be president, [focus on] national security, preserve, protect and enforce the Constitution of the U.S., not re-write it. Provide the strategic leadership on all the issues we face."

Prof. George: "Should the federal government be subsidizing states that discriminate against religious foster and adoption cases?"

"No, because I believe in the First Amendment. The federal government should not be discriminating against any legitimate religion in this country."

Prof. George: "How does your position on marriage differ from Pres. Obama's position?"

"The first thing I would do is make it clear I support the Defense of Marriage Act. I do support traditional marriage. So I happen to believe in addition to being Commander in Chief, [the President is] also Communicator in Chief, to talk about some of these values our Founding Fathers got right. I would use that platform to encourage the values we know the Founding Fathers embraced."

Prof. George: "The two great engines to fight poverty are a vibrant economy and a strong marriage culture. What can we do to rebuild a marriage culture?"

"We have to stop incenting (incentivizing?) broken homes, stop 'incenting' women to have babies to get money from the government.'"

Will you choose a Veep who shares your pro-life and pro-marriage convictions?

"Absolutely."

Grading Herman Cain: a solid "A-"

Rating the Candidates: Michele Bachmann

[Watch the debate live online here.]

This debate is breaking new ground.

Prof. Robby George asks whether Congress has the power to enforce the equal protection of unborn life, under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment. I think Michele Bachmann said yes. This breaks new ground.

Michele Bachmann also offered Pres. Obama's failure to defend DOMA as an abandonment of first principles.

Veep pick: Yes, that person would be pro-life and pro-marriage, she promises.

Should the federal government subsidize states that discriminate against religious adoptions agencies?

She supports legislation to prevent that (paraphrasing): "I believe in equal protection under the law, we have seen a disadvantage to children in foster care or adoption care. This is another example that activist judges are dangerous to the foundation of the society, etc."

Grading Michele Bachmann: a solid "A"

DeMint's Pull in South Carolina

The debate will go live in 5 minutes. The panelists just walked in. Sen. DeMint is introducing the honoraries in the audience (like the NH Speaker of the House).

The South Carolina delegation is particularly impressive. Let me put it this way: if the terrorist attack the convention center right now, it looks like the South Carolina government would be decimated!

The Perry Pull-Out: Texas Wildfires or Fear of Robby George?

Enquiring minds are just asking!

Rick Perry has decided to pull out of this afternoon’s Palmetto Freedom Forum, citing a need to return to Texas to deal with wildfires in the state.“The governor is in close contact with emergency operations officials regarding fires in Texas, including calls with his emergency management chief this morning,” Perry campaign communications secretary Ray Sullivan told CNN. “Gov. Perry is canceling the remainder of his South Carolina schedule today and his California schedule tomorrow in order to return to Texas ASAP.” --WorldMag

I Wish Rick Santorum Were Here

The uninvited using the forum to get their media shots in -- this one via ABC's The Note blog:

No, their invitations didn’t get lost in the mail. They were never sent.

Though most of the major presidential candidates were offered the chance to speak at a Labor Day forum here with Sen. Jim DeMint, two of the contenders were not. Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman were left off the roster because they did not meet the polling threshold set by organizers of Monday’s Palmetto Freedom Forum.

Candidates had to reach five percent or above on the Real Clear Politics national polling average, according to the participation criteria set by the American Principles Project, which is organizing Monday’s event. Huntsman is currently hovering just above one percent nationally and Santorum is at two percent.

But in interviews with ABC News on Monday, both candidates sounded less than thrilled about their exclusion.